Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interiors results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,822 hits. Analysis detected 11,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,171 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,191 of 16,562 topics). This Interiors is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Interiors
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,171
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.3%22.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.0%16.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos