Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interest Rate Policy results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 311 faulty-reasoning hits from 656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ā 95% (917 of 16,562 topics). This Interest Rate Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Interest Rate Policy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 95%Interest Rate Policy (selected)12%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles656 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.4%22.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos