Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intelligent Eyewear results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Unattributed Quote , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 674 hits . Analysis detected 3,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,105 of 16,454 topics). This Intelligent Eyewear is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Intelligent Eyewear
Topic details
Total words: 3,860
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.5% 17.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst