Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intelligence Bureau results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 723 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,804 of 16,562 topics). This Intelligence Bureau is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Intelligence Bureau
Topic details
Total words: 723
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles723 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 4.0%4.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos