Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institutional Knowledge results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.6% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 4,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,461 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of 98% (454 of 16,562 topics). This Institutional Knowledge is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Institutional Knowledge
Topic details
Total words: 1,461
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.3% percentile 16.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 63.6% 63.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 54.8% 54.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 27.4% 27.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 34.4% 34.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 19.9% 19.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 63.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 54.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 34.4%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst