Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovation Management results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,143 of 16,562 topics). This Innovation Management is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Innovation Management
Topic details
Total words: 2,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.8%24.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos