Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inland Empire Operations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 63.5% saturation with 1,261 hits. Analysis detected 4,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (774 of 16,562 topics). This Inland Empire Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Inland Empire Operations
Topic details
Total words: 1,986
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.3% percentile
12.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 63.5%63.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 49.5%49.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 41.1%41.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 16.2%16.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 63.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 49.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 41.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 16.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos