Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Infrastructure Investment results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,459 of 16,562 topics). This Infrastructure Investment is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Infrastructure Investment
Topic details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.4%6.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos