Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Infrastructure Development results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 3,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,706 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,899 of 16,562 topics). This Infrastructure Development is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Infrastructure Development
Topic details
Total words: 2,706
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos