Topic summary
14%1 analyzed article/video510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Information Stealers results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 823 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,655 of 16,562 topics). This Information Stealers is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Information Stealers
Topic details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos