Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Infant Botulism results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anchoring Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Infant Botulism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Infant Botulism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 836
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles836 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos