Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indycar Racing results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 2,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,284 of 15,448 topics). This Indycar Racing is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Indycar Racing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.2%27.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.5%29.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.4%17.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos