Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video1,768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Resistance results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 4,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,783 of 16,562 topics). This Indigenous Resistance is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Indigenous Resistance
Topic details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos