Topic summary
⁠3%3 analyzed articles/videos1,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Art results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,039 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,473 of 16,562 topics). This Indigenous Art is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Indigenous Art
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,039
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
0.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos