Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indiana results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 2,043 hits. Analysis detected 10,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,475 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,809 of 16,562 topics). This Indiana is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Indiana
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,475
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.3%27.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos