Topic summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video1,567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These India UK Relations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,048 hits. Analysis detected 5,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,701 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,342 of 16,562 topics). This India UK Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
India UK Relations
Topic details
Total words: 4,701
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.3%22.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos