Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Income Driven Repayment Plans results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 2,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,802 of 16,562 topics). This Income Driven Repayment Plans is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Income Driven Repayment Plans
Topic details
Total words: 4,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos