Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inclusive Employment results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,011 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,071 of 16,562 topics). This Inclusive Employment is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Inclusive Employment
Topic details
Total words: 1,011
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.3%24.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.1%23.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos