Topic summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Incendios Forestales results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,515 of 16,562 topics). This Incendios Forestales is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Incendios Forestales
Topic details
Total words: 2,163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos