Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Incarceration For Debt results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 1,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (20,152 of 21,118 topics). This Incarceration For Debt is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Incarceration For Debt
Topic details
Total words: 5,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos