Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Incarcerated Women's Rights results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 727 hits. Analysis detected 3,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,397 of 16,562 topics). This Incarcerated Women's Rights is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Incarcerated Women's Rights
Topic details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos