Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Imperial Succession results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Imperial Succession is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Imperial Succession
Topic details
Total words: 352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles352 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos