Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impaired Driving results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,041 of 16,559 topics). This Impaired Driving is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Impaired Driving
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos