Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Of Climate Change On Forests results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 864 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,991 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,766 of 16,562 topics). This Impact Of Climate Change On Forests is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Impact Of Climate Change On Forests
Topic details
Total words: 5,991
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos