Topic summary
86%1 analyzed article/video932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Of AI On Employment results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,901 of 16,562 topics). This Impact Of AI On Employment is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Impact Of AI On Employment
Topic details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.1%17.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Modern Mythology of AI68%
Quillette64%By Peter L. Levin88%7/18/2026, 10:37:24 PM