Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration & The Border results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,666 hits. Analysis detected 12,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,344 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,521 of 15,333 topics). This Immigration & The Border is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Immigration & The Border
Topic details
Total words: 9,344
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos