Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illegal Abortions results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,452 of 16,206 topics). This Illegal Abortions is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Illegal Abortions
Topic details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos