Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iihf World Junior Championship results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 55.4% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 843 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,572 of 15,346 topics). This Iihf World Junior Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Iihf World Junior Championship
Topic details
Total words: 843
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles843 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 55.4%55.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Topic 55.4%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos