Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Operation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 1,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,650 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Operation is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Ice Operation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.2%19.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos