Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Hockey results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 5,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,222 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (538 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Hockey is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Ice Hockey
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,222
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
14.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 47.5%47.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 42.5%42.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 29.2%29.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 30.3%30.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 23.3%23.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 19.1%19.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 17.4%17.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 20.5%20.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 17.2%17.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 18.2%18.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 47.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 42.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Special Pleading: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos