Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Funding results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 4,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,130 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Ice Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.3%24.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos