Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Ice Arrest results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Arrest is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ice Arrest
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos