Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Icc Proceedings results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,752 of 16,562 topics). This Icc Proceedings is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Icc Proceedings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 17.8%17.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos