Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Calderon results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 419 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (492 of 16,562 topics). This Ian Calderon is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Ian Calderon
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 419
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.0% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles419 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 40.8%40.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 55.1%55.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 38.7%38.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.4%27.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 19.3%19.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 22.7%22.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 22.2%22.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 55.1%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 40.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos