Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypogonadism results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 474 hits. Analysis detected 3,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,634 of 16,562 topics). This Hypogonadism is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Hypogonadism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos