Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunting Regulations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 2,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,235 of 16,562 topics). This Hunting Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Hunting Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 3,099
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos