Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunting Policy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 430 hits . Analysis detected 4,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,569 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,454 of 16,559 topics). This Hunting Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Hunting Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,569
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst