Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hunger Relief results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,343 topics). This Hunger Relief is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hunger Relief
Topic details
Total words: 1,480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos