Topic summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Issues results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 4,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,662 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,322 of 15,986 topics). This Humanitarian Issues is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Issues
Topic details
Total words: 7,662
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos