Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Impact results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 191 hits . Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,059 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Humanitarian Impact is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Humanitarian Impact
Topic details
Total words: 1,059
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst