Topic summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Concerns results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 888 hits. Analysis detected 3,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,186 of 16,562 topics). This Humanitarian Concerns is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Humanitarian Concerns
Topic details
Total words: 3,135
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.3%28.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos