Topic summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Survival results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 1,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,773 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,323 of 16,562 topics). This Human Survival is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Human Survival
Topic details
Total words: 1,773
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst