Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Health results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,577 of 16,562 topics). This Human Health is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Human Health
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos