Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hsi Operations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 47.8% saturation with 2,273 hits. Analysis detected 7,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,907 of 16,562 topics). This Hsi Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Hsi Operations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 45.0%45.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 47.8%47.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.9%27.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 45.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos