Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hsi Operations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 47.8% saturation with 2,273 hits . Analysis detected 7,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,907 of 16,562 topics). This Hsi Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Hsi Operations
Topic details
Total words: 4,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.5% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 45.0% 45.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 47.8% 47.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.9% 27.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 45.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst