Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Project results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,047 of 21,862 topics). This Housing Project is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Housing Project
Topic details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos