Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Enforcement results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 2,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,880 of 15,447 topics). This Housing Enforcement is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Housing Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 3,126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos