Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Density results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 1,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,247 of 15,759 topics). This Housing Density is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Housing Density
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos