Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Housing Decisions results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Housing Decisions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Housing Decisions
Topic details
Total words: 3,390
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos