Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Housing Conditions results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Special Pleading, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,355 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Housing Conditions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Housing Conditions
Topic details
Total words: 2,355
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Special Pleading: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos