Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Oversight Investigation results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (35 of 16,488 topics). This House Oversight Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
House Oversight Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 225
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.8% percentile
38.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles225 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 66.7%66.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 49.8%49.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 50.7%50.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 49.3%49.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 50.7%50.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 49.3%49.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 32.9%32.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 49.8%49.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 32.9%32.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Topic 66.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 50.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 50.7%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 49.8%, sitewide 26.9%Red Herring: Topic 49.8%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 49.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 49.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 32.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 16.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos